2244-2280 W 6th Ave rezoning application
Revised Application (July 7, 2025)
This application has been revised. Overall, the proposal has been revised to remove the podium, which is replaced with a two-storey lobby and amenity space. Two 22-storey towers are proposed as opposed to two 20-storey towers over a four-storey podium. Further information is noted below.
The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from RM-4 (Multiple Dwelling) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of two 22-storey rental residential buildings and includes:
- 416 units with 20% of the floor area for below-market units;
- A floor space ratio (FSR) of 6.5;
- A building height of 74.4 m (244 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space; and
- An Enhanced Open Space Setback (EOSS) along West 6th Avenue.
This application is being considered under the Broadway Plan.
The City’s Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy applies to this site. This policy provides assistance and protections to eligible renters impacted by redevelopment activity. To learn more visit: vancouver.ca/protecting-tenants.
Previous Application (December 19, 2024)
The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from RM-4 (Multiple Dwelling) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of two 20-storey residential rental buildings that include:
- 416 units with 20% of the floor area for below-market units;
- A floor space ratio (FSR) of 6.5; and
- A building height of 66.75m (219 ft) with additional height for rooftop amenity space.
This application is being considered under the Broadway Plan.
The City’s Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy applies to this site. This policy provides assistance and protections to eligible renters impacted by redevelopment activity. To learn more visit: vancouver.ca/protecting-tenants.
Application drawings and statistics are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.
Revised Application (July 7, 2025)
This application has been revised. Overall, the proposal has been revised to remove the podium, which is replaced with a two-storey lobby and amenity space. Two 22-storey towers are proposed as opposed to two 20-storey towers over a four-storey podium. Further information is noted below.
The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from RM-4 (Multiple Dwelling) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of two 22-storey rental residential buildings and includes:
- 416 units with 20% of the floor area for below-market units;
- A floor space ratio (FSR) of 6.5;
- A building height of 74.4 m (244 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space; and
- An Enhanced Open Space Setback (EOSS) along West 6th Avenue.
This application is being considered under the Broadway Plan.
The City’s Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy applies to this site. This policy provides assistance and protections to eligible renters impacted by redevelopment activity. To learn more visit: vancouver.ca/protecting-tenants.
Previous Application (December 19, 2024)
The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from RM-4 (Multiple Dwelling) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of two 20-storey residential rental buildings that include:
- 416 units with 20% of the floor area for below-market units;
- A floor space ratio (FSR) of 6.5; and
- A building height of 66.75m (219 ft) with additional height for rooftop amenity space.
This application is being considered under the Broadway Plan.
The City’s Tenant Relocation and Protection Policy applies to this site. This policy provides assistance and protections to eligible renters impacted by redevelopment activity. To learn more visit: vancouver.ca/protecting-tenants.
Application drawings and statistics are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.
The opportunity to ask questions through the Q&A is November 12 to November 25, 2025.
We post all questions as-is and aim to respond within two business days. Some questions may require coordination with internal departments and additional time may be needed to post a response.
Please note that the comment form will remain open after the Q&A period. The Rezoning Planner can also be contacted directly for any further feedback or questions.
-
Share In both the initial and updated booklets posted on the Shape your city site there are inaccurate maps. The context plan map (pg 10) and the policy context map (pg 29) show the development on an existing commercial street rather than a residential street. This suggests to the reader that the towers are built on an existing commercial street rather than West 6. Will the city require the applicant to post a new application booklet with the correct location? What is the expected time frame for this? on Facebook Share In both the initial and updated booklets posted on the Shape your city site there are inaccurate maps. The context plan map (pg 10) and the policy context map (pg 29) show the development on an existing commercial street rather than a residential street. This suggests to the reader that the towers are built on an existing commercial street rather than West 6. Will the city require the applicant to post a new application booklet with the correct location? What is the expected time frame for this? on Twitter Share In both the initial and updated booklets posted on the Shape your city site there are inaccurate maps. The context plan map (pg 10) and the policy context map (pg 29) show the development on an existing commercial street rather than a residential street. This suggests to the reader that the towers are built on an existing commercial street rather than West 6. Will the city require the applicant to post a new application booklet with the correct location? What is the expected time frame for this? on Linkedin Email In both the initial and updated booklets posted on the Shape your city site there are inaccurate maps. The context plan map (pg 10) and the policy context map (pg 29) show the development on an existing commercial street rather than a residential street. This suggests to the reader that the towers are built on an existing commercial street rather than West 6. Will the city require the applicant to post a new application booklet with the correct location? What is the expected time frame for this? link
In both the initial and updated booklets posted on the Shape your city site there are inaccurate maps. The context plan map (pg 10) and the policy context map (pg 29) show the development on an existing commercial street rather than a residential street. This suggests to the reader that the towers are built on an existing commercial street rather than West 6. Will the city require the applicant to post a new application booklet with the correct location? What is the expected time frame for this?
Alog10 asked 9 days agoThank you for your question. You are correct that there are some mistakes on these maps. We’ve reached out to the applicant to have these corrected. Once received, the updated rezoning booklet will be posted on the Shape Your City page. We should have it updated within the next week or so.
-
Share As VanMaps indicates these properties are now zoned R5-4, which allows for buildings of up to 84 meters tall, and a floor space ratio of 6.5, why is this rezoning application needed? on Facebook Share As VanMaps indicates these properties are now zoned R5-4, which allows for buildings of up to 84 meters tall, and a floor space ratio of 6.5, why is this rezoning application needed? on Twitter Share As VanMaps indicates these properties are now zoned R5-4, which allows for buildings of up to 84 meters tall, and a floor space ratio of 6.5, why is this rezoning application needed? on Linkedin Email As VanMaps indicates these properties are now zoned R5-4, which allows for buildings of up to 84 meters tall, and a floor space ratio of 6.5, why is this rezoning application needed? link
As VanMaps indicates these properties are now zoned R5-4, which allows for buildings of up to 84 meters tall, and a floor space ratio of 6.5, why is this rezoning application needed?
Silent_Echo asked 5 days agoThis site was rezoned to R5-4 though City-initiated zoning changes in the Broadway Plan area in October 2025. Because the CD-1 rezoning application was already in progress when the new zoning changes were approved, the applicant had the option to either continue with their application, or withdraw and apply for a Development Permit under the new R5-4 zoning district. The applicant chose to continue with their CD-1 rezoning application.
-
Share The updated application booklet includes conflicting information about the location of the lane designations. Page 40 informs the reader that "The rear lane will seamlessly connect to the side lanes at both the east and west end via 45-degree chamfers" and references the west lane of the 2267-2275 West 7th development. This is what maps show on pages 45, 98-100 and the "Rezoning Application Fly Through" video. However, maps on pages 40, 42, 44, 86 and 88-96 show a different outline. The two versions are materially different as the second outline show lanes built through two existing buildings that are not part of this development. Will city residents be provided with a revised Application (and corresponding chance to comment on it) showing accurate lane designations to ensure a fair and transparent process? on Facebook Share The updated application booklet includes conflicting information about the location of the lane designations. Page 40 informs the reader that "The rear lane will seamlessly connect to the side lanes at both the east and west end via 45-degree chamfers" and references the west lane of the 2267-2275 West 7th development. This is what maps show on pages 45, 98-100 and the "Rezoning Application Fly Through" video. However, maps on pages 40, 42, 44, 86 and 88-96 show a different outline. The two versions are materially different as the second outline show lanes built through two existing buildings that are not part of this development. Will city residents be provided with a revised Application (and corresponding chance to comment on it) showing accurate lane designations to ensure a fair and transparent process? on Twitter Share The updated application booklet includes conflicting information about the location of the lane designations. Page 40 informs the reader that "The rear lane will seamlessly connect to the side lanes at both the east and west end via 45-degree chamfers" and references the west lane of the 2267-2275 West 7th development. This is what maps show on pages 45, 98-100 and the "Rezoning Application Fly Through" video. However, maps on pages 40, 42, 44, 86 and 88-96 show a different outline. The two versions are materially different as the second outline show lanes built through two existing buildings that are not part of this development. Will city residents be provided with a revised Application (and corresponding chance to comment on it) showing accurate lane designations to ensure a fair and transparent process? on Linkedin Email The updated application booklet includes conflicting information about the location of the lane designations. Page 40 informs the reader that "The rear lane will seamlessly connect to the side lanes at both the east and west end via 45-degree chamfers" and references the west lane of the 2267-2275 West 7th development. This is what maps show on pages 45, 98-100 and the "Rezoning Application Fly Through" video. However, maps on pages 40, 42, 44, 86 and 88-96 show a different outline. The two versions are materially different as the second outline show lanes built through two existing buildings that are not part of this development. Will city residents be provided with a revised Application (and corresponding chance to comment on it) showing accurate lane designations to ensure a fair and transparent process? link
The updated application booklet includes conflicting information about the location of the lane designations. Page 40 informs the reader that "The rear lane will seamlessly connect to the side lanes at both the east and west end via 45-degree chamfers" and references the west lane of the 2267-2275 West 7th development. This is what maps show on pages 45, 98-100 and the "Rezoning Application Fly Through" video. However, maps on pages 40, 42, 44, 86 and 88-96 show a different outline. The two versions are materially different as the second outline show lanes built through two existing buildings that are not part of this development. Will city residents be provided with a revised Application (and corresponding chance to comment on it) showing accurate lane designations to ensure a fair and transparent process?
Informed3855 asked 11 days agoThank you for your question.
This application will be required to provide a 20 foot full lane dedication along the east property line, and a 10 foot half lane dedication along the south property line. This dedication will be included as a condition of approval in the final Council report, meaning the applicant must meet these lane requirements before the CD-1 by-law is enacted by Council. The other 10 feet of the south dedication would be provided if the properties along West 7th Avenue redevelop (e.g. 2225, 2267, 2275, and 2280 W 7th Ave). Eventually, the goal is for a T-shaped lane to connect north/south between 6th and 7th Avenue parallel to Yew Street, and then connect west to Vine Street. This is a long-term goal that is contingent on other properties on this block redeveloping, and won’t be completed with this application. Some of the plans you refer to (p. 42, 44, and 86) are showing what this future condition would look like if the rest of the block redevelops. At this point, these plans are conceptual and the final lane layout on this block will depend on how it redevelops. The applicant won’t be required to provide updated lane plans with their rezoning application, as the lane requirements will be secured as a condition of approval and detailed technical drawings will be reviewed by Engineering staff during the Development Permit and Building Permit processes, if the rezoning is approved. Any errors in the lane plans in the rezoning booklet would be corrected during those permit processes. However as I mentioned, the lane dedication requirement will be included in the final Council report, which will be posted online for the public to view.
-
Share I want to raise 2 questions. How will increased demand on parking spaces in the immediate area be addressed? This is already a significant problem and will get worse with over 400 new units and only 141 parking spaces (in addition to similar new developments planned or already approved on every block in the immediate vicinity!) Permit parking alone will not address this issue. What is your larger plan for traffic and parking? Second, how does the removal of so many mature trees fit into the city's promise to preserve the tree canopy? The current trees provide a natural buffer and green zone between existing buildings on 6th and adjacent buildings on 7th. Will the developer be required to plant new trees on the north side of the property where the current trees exist, or in some other way offset the building with a green zone on the north side of the property? on Facebook Share I want to raise 2 questions. How will increased demand on parking spaces in the immediate area be addressed? This is already a significant problem and will get worse with over 400 new units and only 141 parking spaces (in addition to similar new developments planned or already approved on every block in the immediate vicinity!) Permit parking alone will not address this issue. What is your larger plan for traffic and parking? Second, how does the removal of so many mature trees fit into the city's promise to preserve the tree canopy? The current trees provide a natural buffer and green zone between existing buildings on 6th and adjacent buildings on 7th. Will the developer be required to plant new trees on the north side of the property where the current trees exist, or in some other way offset the building with a green zone on the north side of the property? on Twitter Share I want to raise 2 questions. How will increased demand on parking spaces in the immediate area be addressed? This is already a significant problem and will get worse with over 400 new units and only 141 parking spaces (in addition to similar new developments planned or already approved on every block in the immediate vicinity!) Permit parking alone will not address this issue. What is your larger plan for traffic and parking? Second, how does the removal of so many mature trees fit into the city's promise to preserve the tree canopy? The current trees provide a natural buffer and green zone between existing buildings on 6th and adjacent buildings on 7th. Will the developer be required to plant new trees on the north side of the property where the current trees exist, or in some other way offset the building with a green zone on the north side of the property? on Linkedin Email I want to raise 2 questions. How will increased demand on parking spaces in the immediate area be addressed? This is already a significant problem and will get worse with over 400 new units and only 141 parking spaces (in addition to similar new developments planned or already approved on every block in the immediate vicinity!) Permit parking alone will not address this issue. What is your larger plan for traffic and parking? Second, how does the removal of so many mature trees fit into the city's promise to preserve the tree canopy? The current trees provide a natural buffer and green zone between existing buildings on 6th and adjacent buildings on 7th. Will the developer be required to plant new trees on the north side of the property where the current trees exist, or in some other way offset the building with a green zone on the north side of the property? link
I want to raise 2 questions. How will increased demand on parking spaces in the immediate area be addressed? This is already a significant problem and will get worse with over 400 new units and only 141 parking spaces (in addition to similar new developments planned or already approved on every block in the immediate vicinity!) Permit parking alone will not address this issue. What is your larger plan for traffic and parking? Second, how does the removal of so many mature trees fit into the city's promise to preserve the tree canopy? The current trees provide a natural buffer and green zone between existing buildings on 6th and adjacent buildings on 7th. Will the developer be required to plant new trees on the north side of the property where the current trees exist, or in some other way offset the building with a green zone on the north side of the property?
Gillian Creese asked 14 days agoThank you for your questions. We will be reaching out to our colleagues in Engineering and Landscape and have a reply for you soon.
Update (November 19th, 2025): The site is well-located to encourage transportation modes other than vehicle trips, due to the proximity to the future Arbutus Skytrain station and bikeways (including 10th Avenue, 7th Avenue, and the Arbutus Greenway) . These transportation infrastructure investments aim to minimize the need for daily vehicle trips for those that live and work in the neighbourhood. If the rezoning is approved by City Council, the applicant will also have to provide a Transportation Demand Management plan with their Development Permit application, which helps to reduce development demand for vehicle trips and parking. The development will also provide loading spaces for passenger pickup/drop off and vehicle loading/unloading for vans, trucks, etc.
Where onsite tree retention is feasible, this is communicated to the applicant team. The majority of onsite tree removals within this proposal are being removed to facilitate the new lane requirements this proposal must comply with. The new lane is required to be constructed along the east and south property lines. Replacement trees are required as per the Protection of Trees Bylaw on a 1 to 1 basis for all removed trees. This proposal is providing a below grade setback along the north property line along West 6th Avenue, where replacement trees are proposed. This proposal also must comply with the Enhanced Open Space Setback requirements, which will secure a portion of the site as open space, providing a park-like feel completed with planting and trees. Aside from the Enhanced Open Space Setback, additional replacement trees planted will be planted on site, along with tiered planters complete with smaller plant material.
-
Share All 25 on-site mature trees would be removed and none would be retained as part of this development proposal. This appears to be in conflict with Section 11.1.49 of the Broadway plan (maximize tree retention) and would challenge the city's Urban Forest Strategy. If these 27 mature trees are allowed to be cut down, there will be a significant and long term negative impact to Vancouver’s goal of a 30% Canopy Cover Target. Can you detail how city staff will view the loss of these mature trees when evaluating this proposal? Thank you. on Facebook Share All 25 on-site mature trees would be removed and none would be retained as part of this development proposal. This appears to be in conflict with Section 11.1.49 of the Broadway plan (maximize tree retention) and would challenge the city's Urban Forest Strategy. If these 27 mature trees are allowed to be cut down, there will be a significant and long term negative impact to Vancouver’s goal of a 30% Canopy Cover Target. Can you detail how city staff will view the loss of these mature trees when evaluating this proposal? Thank you. on Twitter Share All 25 on-site mature trees would be removed and none would be retained as part of this development proposal. This appears to be in conflict with Section 11.1.49 of the Broadway plan (maximize tree retention) and would challenge the city's Urban Forest Strategy. If these 27 mature trees are allowed to be cut down, there will be a significant and long term negative impact to Vancouver’s goal of a 30% Canopy Cover Target. Can you detail how city staff will view the loss of these mature trees when evaluating this proposal? Thank you. on Linkedin Email All 25 on-site mature trees would be removed and none would be retained as part of this development proposal. This appears to be in conflict with Section 11.1.49 of the Broadway plan (maximize tree retention) and would challenge the city's Urban Forest Strategy. If these 27 mature trees are allowed to be cut down, there will be a significant and long term negative impact to Vancouver’s goal of a 30% Canopy Cover Target. Can you detail how city staff will view the loss of these mature trees when evaluating this proposal? Thank you. link
All 25 on-site mature trees would be removed and none would be retained as part of this development proposal. This appears to be in conflict with Section 11.1.49 of the Broadway plan (maximize tree retention) and would challenge the city's Urban Forest Strategy. If these 27 mature trees are allowed to be cut down, there will be a significant and long term negative impact to Vancouver’s goal of a 30% Canopy Cover Target. Can you detail how city staff will view the loss of these mature trees when evaluating this proposal? Thank you.
Informed3855 asked 15 days agoThank you for your question. We will be reaching out to our colleagues in Landscape and have a reply for you soon.
Update (November 19, 2025): Staff consider the size and canopy cover current trees are providing when reviewing the conceptual plans for proposed replacement trees. While the details are not finalized at the rezoning stage, we use this information about the existing trees to evaluate the current tree replacement strategy. We review replacement trees locations, soil depths for replacement trees, and to identify any areas where additional replacement trees can be planted. In situations where extreme canopy loss is presented, staff can ask for additional replacement trees, greater soil depth to support replacement tree growth, and additional items we see fit. If the rezoning application is approved by City Council, the tree replacement plan will be finalized at the Development Permit stage. -
Share The Broadway Plan is crystal clear that non–social-housing developments must be consistent with the existing scale and character of their surroundings. This site is surrounded by 3–6-storey homes and heritage buildings, not towers. Previous City responses to Broadway Plan queries have suggested that “context” is only one of several factors considered under the Plan. But Section 11.2.1 explicitly defines scale and character consistency as a requirement,not an optional guideline balanced against other objectives. So I’d like staff to clarify: On what basis specifically, is a 25-storey tower on a local residential side street considered “consistent with existing context” under the Broadway Plan? Please cite the specific clause that permits staff to override this condition for a non-social-housing proposal. Thank you. on Facebook Share The Broadway Plan is crystal clear that non–social-housing developments must be consistent with the existing scale and character of their surroundings. This site is surrounded by 3–6-storey homes and heritage buildings, not towers. Previous City responses to Broadway Plan queries have suggested that “context” is only one of several factors considered under the Plan. But Section 11.2.1 explicitly defines scale and character consistency as a requirement,not an optional guideline balanced against other objectives. So I’d like staff to clarify: On what basis specifically, is a 25-storey tower on a local residential side street considered “consistent with existing context” under the Broadway Plan? Please cite the specific clause that permits staff to override this condition for a non-social-housing proposal. Thank you. on Twitter Share The Broadway Plan is crystal clear that non–social-housing developments must be consistent with the existing scale and character of their surroundings. This site is surrounded by 3–6-storey homes and heritage buildings, not towers. Previous City responses to Broadway Plan queries have suggested that “context” is only one of several factors considered under the Plan. But Section 11.2.1 explicitly defines scale and character consistency as a requirement,not an optional guideline balanced against other objectives. So I’d like staff to clarify: On what basis specifically, is a 25-storey tower on a local residential side street considered “consistent with existing context” under the Broadway Plan? Please cite the specific clause that permits staff to override this condition for a non-social-housing proposal. Thank you. on Linkedin Email The Broadway Plan is crystal clear that non–social-housing developments must be consistent with the existing scale and character of their surroundings. This site is surrounded by 3–6-storey homes and heritage buildings, not towers. Previous City responses to Broadway Plan queries have suggested that “context” is only one of several factors considered under the Plan. But Section 11.2.1 explicitly defines scale and character consistency as a requirement,not an optional guideline balanced against other objectives. So I’d like staff to clarify: On what basis specifically, is a 25-storey tower on a local residential side street considered “consistent with existing context” under the Broadway Plan? Please cite the specific clause that permits staff to override this condition for a non-social-housing proposal. Thank you. link
The Broadway Plan is crystal clear that non–social-housing developments must be consistent with the existing scale and character of their surroundings. This site is surrounded by 3–6-storey homes and heritage buildings, not towers. Previous City responses to Broadway Plan queries have suggested that “context” is only one of several factors considered under the Plan. But Section 11.2.1 explicitly defines scale and character consistency as a requirement,not an optional guideline balanced against other objectives. So I’d like staff to clarify: On what basis specifically, is a 25-storey tower on a local residential side street considered “consistent with existing context” under the Broadway Plan? Please cite the specific clause that permits staff to override this condition for a non-social-housing proposal. Thank you.
crashkate asked 18 days agoThank you for your question. 2244-2280 West 6th Avenue is located in the Kitsilano North - Area B (KKNB) sub-area of the Broadway Plan. The policies outlined in this sub-area (section 8.2) are the main framework staff use to evaluate the rezoning application. Section 11.2.1 which you mention in your question speaks to the maximum density for multiplexes and townhouses, so that's not a section we refer to when evaluating tower proposals. The KKNB sub-area allows tower forms on sites with a minimum frontage of 150 feet. Non-tower forms (3-6 storey buildings) are permitted on sites where a tower cannot be achieved due to lot conditions or tower limit policies. In this case, the applicant chose to propose towers as the site meets the criteria for tower forms.
You are correct that surrounding context is one thing staff consider when evaluating rezoning applications. We also consider the emerging character of the neighbourhood and the policy directions of the specific sub-area, as well as architectural guidelines for the proposed building form (e.g. section 11.4 for mid- to high-rise apartment). The KKNB sub-area does not have a specific requirement that rezoning applications must be consistent with existing scale and character. The building design is currently under review and there may be conditions of approval in the final Council report to improve the contextual fit and architectural expression through the development permit process. The rezoning process secures the overall form of development (building height, density, placement), and the more detailed review of building architecture occurs at the development permit phase, if Council approves the rezoning.
-
Share Please provide information on number of parking spaces that will be incorporated into this proposed development. With 416 units, most likely occupied by an average of 2 people per unit, parking is an important component to the development and a major concern to local residents in a neighborhood that currently has very limited street parking available. Speaking as a retired real estate developer, who was required to stiputate the number of parking stalls in all our development applications, I find it surprising and somewhat suspicious that the NOTICE OF RESONING APPLICATION "doesn't" include any reference to parking inclusions. on Facebook Share Please provide information on number of parking spaces that will be incorporated into this proposed development. With 416 units, most likely occupied by an average of 2 people per unit, parking is an important component to the development and a major concern to local residents in a neighborhood that currently has very limited street parking available. Speaking as a retired real estate developer, who was required to stiputate the number of parking stalls in all our development applications, I find it surprising and somewhat suspicious that the NOTICE OF RESONING APPLICATION "doesn't" include any reference to parking inclusions. on Twitter Share Please provide information on number of parking spaces that will be incorporated into this proposed development. With 416 units, most likely occupied by an average of 2 people per unit, parking is an important component to the development and a major concern to local residents in a neighborhood that currently has very limited street parking available. Speaking as a retired real estate developer, who was required to stiputate the number of parking stalls in all our development applications, I find it surprising and somewhat suspicious that the NOTICE OF RESONING APPLICATION "doesn't" include any reference to parking inclusions. on Linkedin Email Please provide information on number of parking spaces that will be incorporated into this proposed development. With 416 units, most likely occupied by an average of 2 people per unit, parking is an important component to the development and a major concern to local residents in a neighborhood that currently has very limited street parking available. Speaking as a retired real estate developer, who was required to stiputate the number of parking stalls in all our development applications, I find it surprising and somewhat suspicious that the NOTICE OF RESONING APPLICATION "doesn't" include any reference to parking inclusions. link
Please provide information on number of parking spaces that will be incorporated into this proposed development. With 416 units, most likely occupied by an average of 2 people per unit, parking is an important component to the development and a major concern to local residents in a neighborhood that currently has very limited street parking available. Speaking as a retired real estate developer, who was required to stiputate the number of parking stalls in all our development applications, I find it surprising and somewhat suspicious that the NOTICE OF RESONING APPLICATION "doesn't" include any reference to parking inclusions.
MarkD asked 18 days agoThe applicant has proposed a total of 141 parking spaces. The parking statistics are included on page 10 of the rezoning booklet: https://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/2244-2280-w-6-ave/architectual-drawings.pdf#page=10
Key dates
-
December 19 2024
-
July 07 2025
-
November 12 → November 25 2025
Location
Revised application documents
Previous application documents
Applicable plans and policies
Contact applicant
-
Phone 236-982-0194 Email Colin.Kehoe@colliers.com
Contact us
-
Phone 604-269-5609 Email Hanna.Jarrett@vancouver.ca