2345-2349 Main St rezoning application

Share 2345-2349 Main St rezoning application on Facebook Share 2345-2349 Main St rezoning application on Twitter Share 2345-2349 Main St rezoning application on Linkedin Email 2345-2349 Main St rezoning application link

The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from C-3A (Commercial) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a 26-storey mixed-use building with a 2-storey podium and heritage retention, and includes:

  • 315 student housing and dormitory units;
  • Commercial space on the ground floor;
  • 3 levels of underground cultural spaces (expansion of Goh Ballet)
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 21.3;
  • A building height of 67.9 m (223 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space; and
  • Retention of the Royal Bank Heritage Building (Vancouver Heritage Register).

This application is being considered under the Broadway Plan and requests consideration of density and height in excess of the existing policy.

The site includes a heritage building at 2345 Main Street, and as such, the City’s Heritage Program and Heritage Policies apply. The application proposes retention of the street façades along Main Street and East 8th Avenue for what was originally built as the Royal Bank building (Vancouver Heritage Register).

Application drawings and statistics are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.



Announcements
August 25, 2025

Rezoning Booklet and Architectural Drawings have been reposted with updated Shadow studies and Tower separation analysis.

The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from C-3A (Commercial) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a 26-storey mixed-use building with a 2-storey podium and heritage retention, and includes:

  • 315 student housing and dormitory units;
  • Commercial space on the ground floor;
  • 3 levels of underground cultural spaces (expansion of Goh Ballet)
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 21.3;
  • A building height of 67.9 m (223 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space; and
  • Retention of the Royal Bank Heritage Building (Vancouver Heritage Register).

This application is being considered under the Broadway Plan and requests consideration of density and height in excess of the existing policy.

The site includes a heritage building at 2345 Main Street, and as such, the City’s Heritage Program and Heritage Policies apply. The application proposes retention of the street façades along Main Street and East 8th Avenue for what was originally built as the Royal Bank building (Vancouver Heritage Register).

Application drawings and statistics are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.



Announcements
August 25, 2025

Rezoning Booklet and Architectural Drawings have been reposted with updated Shadow studies and Tower separation analysis.

​The Q&A period has concluded. Thank you for participating.

The opportunity to ask questions through the Q&A is available from October 22 to November 4, 2025. 

We post all questions as-is and aim to respond within two business days. Some questions may require coordination with internal departments and additional time may be needed to post a response.

Please note that the comment form will remain open after the Q&A period. The Rezoning Planner can also be contacted directly for any further feedback or questions.

  • Share Will there be a townhall meeting for a chance to speak out on this monstrosity? on Facebook Share Will there be a townhall meeting for a chance to speak out on this monstrosity? on Twitter Share Will there be a townhall meeting for a chance to speak out on this monstrosity? on Linkedin Email Will there be a townhall meeting for a chance to speak out on this monstrosity? link

    Will there be a townhall meeting for a chance to speak out on this monstrosity?

    westcoast604 asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your question. There are several opportunities for the public to provide feedback on a rezoning project:

    1. During the Q&A period, staff and the applicant share information about the proposal, listen to concerns and get input from the public, while providing clarifications on the proposal or enabling policy. At any time during the rezoning review, members of the public are also welcome to forward additional questions to the rezoning planner via email. The comments tab stays also open beyond the Q&A period. The feedback, input and concerns will inform the review of the rezoning application. A summary of all comments, questions, phone calls and emails received will be provided in the referral report for Council to consider. 
    2. Prior to and during the Public Hearing the public will be able to provide written and in-person feedback to Council. If you leave a comment on Shape your City, you can let us know if you’d like to stay informed about the project, in which case you will be notified about the public hearing. 

    About a week before the Public Hearing the agenda, including a link to the referral report, is published on this website: https://covapp.vancouver.ca/councilMeetingPublic/CouncilMeetings.aspx

    If correspondence is received by the rezoning planner after the project went to referral, the member of the public is informed that the application is on the agenda for a specific public hearing date, that the comments received  will not been shared with the Mayor and Councillors as Vancouver City Council has referred this item to Public Hearing and all Public Hearing correspondence must be made public. The person is advised that they should at this point submit their comments via the online form (https://vancouver.ca/your-government/contact-council-public-hearing.aspx) to be put on the public record. 

    Public Hearing correspondence received through the Public Hearing online form is circulated to Mayor and Council, and made publicly available online on the Public Hearing agenda page. The name of the commenter will be made public; but the contact information will not be posted online. Agendas are available on the City of Vancouver website approximately one week before the meeting and can be access via https://covapp.vancouver.ca/councilMeetingPublic/CouncilMeetings.aspx.

    To learn more about Public Hearings, please visit the website at https://vancouver.ca/your-government/what-happens-at-a-public-hearing.aspx, https://vancouver.ca/your-government/city-council-meetings-and-decisions.aspx and https://vancouver.ca/your-government/contact-council-public-hearing.aspx

  • Share How does thins blend with the esthetic of the neighbour hood. It is the most hideous design I have ever seen. It would severly destroy and historical community feeling of the historic triangle area. on Facebook Share How does thins blend with the esthetic of the neighbour hood. It is the most hideous design I have ever seen. It would severly destroy and historical community feeling of the historic triangle area. on Twitter Share How does thins blend with the esthetic of the neighbour hood. It is the most hideous design I have ever seen. It would severly destroy and historical community feeling of the historic triangle area. on Linkedin Email How does thins blend with the esthetic of the neighbour hood. It is the most hideous design I have ever seen. It would severly destroy and historical community feeling of the historic triangle area. link

    How does thins blend with the esthetic of the neighbour hood. It is the most hideous design I have ever seen. It would severly destroy and historical community feeling of the historic triangle area.

    westcoast604 asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your comment. Please submit general comments through the “send your comments tab". Staff will include a summary of comments provided from the public in a Council report if the project proceeds for Council consideration."

  • Share What's the basis for the 21.3 FSR over the 5.00 allowable under the Province's TOA policy? I would understand if the applicant asked for 5.50 FSR (10% as a heritage bonus), but this seems to go beyond any existing policy. Also, given that this is targeting student housing, is there any rent cap on the units, like a below-market project would see? It would be a massive disappointment if these turned into micro suites costing a premium for a user-group which doesn't typically have much income. on Facebook Share What's the basis for the 21.3 FSR over the 5.00 allowable under the Province's TOA policy? I would understand if the applicant asked for 5.50 FSR (10% as a heritage bonus), but this seems to go beyond any existing policy. Also, given that this is targeting student housing, is there any rent cap on the units, like a below-market project would see? It would be a massive disappointment if these turned into micro suites costing a premium for a user-group which doesn't typically have much income. on Twitter Share What's the basis for the 21.3 FSR over the 5.00 allowable under the Province's TOA policy? I would understand if the applicant asked for 5.50 FSR (10% as a heritage bonus), but this seems to go beyond any existing policy. Also, given that this is targeting student housing, is there any rent cap on the units, like a below-market project would see? It would be a massive disappointment if these turned into micro suites costing a premium for a user-group which doesn't typically have much income. on Linkedin Email What's the basis for the 21.3 FSR over the 5.00 allowable under the Province's TOA policy? I would understand if the applicant asked for 5.50 FSR (10% as a heritage bonus), but this seems to go beyond any existing policy. Also, given that this is targeting student housing, is there any rent cap on the units, like a below-market project would see? It would be a massive disappointment if these turned into micro suites costing a premium for a user-group which doesn't typically have much income. link

    What's the basis for the 21.3 FSR over the 5.00 allowable under the Province's TOA policy? I would understand if the applicant asked for 5.50 FSR (10% as a heritage bonus), but this seems to go beyond any existing policy. Also, given that this is targeting student housing, is there any rent cap on the units, like a below-market project would see? It would be a massive disappointment if these turned into micro suites costing a premium for a user-group which doesn't typically have much income.

    ccc asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your question.  Please note that Staff are compelled to process all rezoning applications, regardless of the initial compliance with City policy and posts them “as is” on Shape your City. That does not imply staff support. Staff review of this project is currently underway. As part of the process, the City seeks the input of the public on applications to contribute to the staff review process. As part of our review process, we work with applicants to refine their application with the objective of aligning with applicable plans and the intent of Council adopted policy. 

    In this regard, we consider a number of factors based on current policy directions, i.e., the Broadway Plan and other provincial policies, such as Transit Orientated Area development objectives. You are correct, the Broadway Plan as originally approved by Council in June 2022 did not enable rezonings for additional height and density in the Main Street Village area and maintained the existing 6-storey C-3A zoning. Building heights stepped up to the east and west of the Village area, and north of 7th Ave. The only exception was a small increase in height and density in mid-rise form could be considered for rezonings with heritage retention and cultural uses under the original policy 10.6.5. The Province’s TOA legislation (Bill 47) requires the City to consider a minimum of 20-storeys within 200m of rapid transit stations, which encompasses the site at 2345-2349 Main St. The Broadway Plan was amended by Council in December 2024 to comply with the TOA legislative requirements. The Plan’s built form and site design policies for mixed-use residential towers still apply, and those will be important considerations in staff’s review of this rezoning application. As you note, the proposed height in this rezoning application exceeds what the policy anticipates for this location. 

    As part of this review, we also consider matters such as contextual fit, appropriate mix of land uses, appropriate heights and densities, public realm implications, availability of transportation and infrastructure capacity, land speculation, tenant displacement as well as school capacity and access to community centres and public amenities, among other things.  These factors are weighed against good planning principles and Council priorities.  We consider these range of factors, including the public’s input, before coming to final recommendations for Council’s consideration. Following review, Staff makes a recommendation to Council to approve or refuse the proposal, and ultimately it is up to Council to make the final decision. Input from the public, neighbourhood stakeholders, and civic agencies like UDP all helps to inform future staff recommendations to Council. We welcome your input in this regard, and participation in a future public hearing when this project is presented to Council for decision.

    If the project is approved as a secured rental project, the rental tenure would be secured on title through a Housing Agreement, which would outline the approved affordability and rental requirements. If the project is approved as a secured student housing project, a post-secondary institution is required to own the units or lease the units for 60 years or the life of the building. The student housing would be secured on title through a student housing covenant and Housing Agreement, which would outline the approved rental model and requirements.

  • Share I also have a few questions about the parking. I saw the previous reply saying: “There are no minimum requirements for regular parking stalls. Due to site constraints and the site’s close proximity to current and upcoming major public transit, no parking spaces are proposed on the site.” Who sets the minimum requirements for regular parking stalls - is this determined by the City (government)? I understand the point about the site’s proximity to public transit. However, there is already very limited street parking in this area. Has any study or assessment been conducted to confirm that this proximity will adequately address residents’ and visitors’ parking needs? Will the future residents of 2345–2349 Main Street be expected to have *no* personal vehicles? on Facebook Share I also have a few questions about the parking. I saw the previous reply saying: “There are no minimum requirements for regular parking stalls. Due to site constraints and the site’s close proximity to current and upcoming major public transit, no parking spaces are proposed on the site.” Who sets the minimum requirements for regular parking stalls - is this determined by the City (government)? I understand the point about the site’s proximity to public transit. However, there is already very limited street parking in this area. Has any study or assessment been conducted to confirm that this proximity will adequately address residents’ and visitors’ parking needs? Will the future residents of 2345–2349 Main Street be expected to have *no* personal vehicles? on Twitter Share I also have a few questions about the parking. I saw the previous reply saying: “There are no minimum requirements for regular parking stalls. Due to site constraints and the site’s close proximity to current and upcoming major public transit, no parking spaces are proposed on the site.” Who sets the minimum requirements for regular parking stalls - is this determined by the City (government)? I understand the point about the site’s proximity to public transit. However, there is already very limited street parking in this area. Has any study or assessment been conducted to confirm that this proximity will adequately address residents’ and visitors’ parking needs? Will the future residents of 2345–2349 Main Street be expected to have *no* personal vehicles? on Linkedin Email I also have a few questions about the parking. I saw the previous reply saying: “There are no minimum requirements for regular parking stalls. Due to site constraints and the site’s close proximity to current and upcoming major public transit, no parking spaces are proposed on the site.” Who sets the minimum requirements for regular parking stalls - is this determined by the City (government)? I understand the point about the site’s proximity to public transit. However, there is already very limited street parking in this area. Has any study or assessment been conducted to confirm that this proximity will adequately address residents’ and visitors’ parking needs? Will the future residents of 2345–2349 Main Street be expected to have *no* personal vehicles? link

    I also have a few questions about the parking. I saw the previous reply saying: “There are no minimum requirements for regular parking stalls. Due to site constraints and the site’s close proximity to current and upcoming major public transit, no parking spaces are proposed on the site.” Who sets the minimum requirements for regular parking stalls - is this determined by the City (government)? I understand the point about the site’s proximity to public transit. However, there is already very limited street parking in this area. Has any study or assessment been conducted to confirm that this proximity will adequately address residents’ and visitors’ parking needs? Will the future residents of 2345–2349 Main Street be expected to have *no* personal vehicles?

    ID asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your question. Minimum parking requirements are set by the City and approved by Council. Currently in Vancouver, there are no parking minimums for general purpose vehicle parking, however, accessible parking, visitor parking, and bicycle parking spaces are still required on this site as per the Parking By-law. The developer may wish to provide general purpose parking for future occupants based on market expectations, site constraints, and economic implications.

  • Share I don't see any parking spot built into this proposal. where would the people living/working here park their cars? on Facebook Share I don't see any parking spot built into this proposal. where would the people living/working here park their cars? on Twitter Share I don't see any parking spot built into this proposal. where would the people living/working here park their cars? on Linkedin Email I don't see any parking spot built into this proposal. where would the people living/working here park their cars? link

    I don't see any parking spot built into this proposal. where would the people living/working here park their cars?

    D Echo asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your question. The proposed development is required to comply with the Parking By-law with respect to off-street vehicle parking spaces. A Transportation Demand Management Plan will also be required. As part of the rezoning process, Engineering staff review the application with respect to transportation impacts and may include development conditions for off-site requirements to improve transportation operations and safety for pedestrians, cyclists, and motorists adjacent to the site.

    We also sent the question to the applicant, and this is their response: “There are no minimum requirements for regular parking stalls. Due to site constraints and the site’s close proximity to current and upcoming major public transit, no parking spaces are proposed on the site.”

  • Share Will this tower provide any residential housing for non-students of the academy? on Facebook Share Will this tower provide any residential housing for non-students of the academy? on Twitter Share Will this tower provide any residential housing for non-students of the academy? on Linkedin Email Will this tower provide any residential housing for non-students of the academy? link

    Will this tower provide any residential housing for non-students of the academy?

    Kz asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for your question which we shared with the applicant. This is their response: “At this point, the housing units are considered for students, including students at the Goh Ballet school and other higher education institutions such as UBC, SFU, BCIT, VCC, and others.”

    From a City perspective, the applicant will need an agreement with a post-secondary institutions as the operator to secure the units as student housing. If such an agreement cannot be achieved, the applicant will need to provide the housing as secured rental, fulfilling all policy and regulatory requirements, e.g. minimum unit size, self-contained units and family-unit requirements, although they can still cooperate with an educational institution and offer the units mainly to students. 

Page last updated: 05 Nov 2025, 08:51 AM