441 E Pender St rezoning application

Share 441 E Pender St rezoning application on Facebook Share 441 E Pender St rezoning application on Twitter Share 441 E Pender St rezoning application on Linkedin Email 441 E Pender St rezoning application link


Announcement
(December 16, 2025)

In response to the in-person community information session on November 24, 2025 and public feedback received on this application, the applicant has incorporated a unit mix into the proposed development. The proposal now includes 55 social housing units, including 46 micro-dwelling suites, four larger accessible studio units, and five two-bedroom units.

The “test fit” drawings which demonstrate inclusion of a unit mix are included on the righthand side of this page, under the “application documents” heading.

The application continues to propose social housing, and the applicant is considering partnering with Lookout as the proposed building operator.

For information, at the rezoning stage, Council does not approve a specific building operator as part of a proposal. Housing operators are typically secured at later development stages, to provide projects flexibility with senior government funding opportunities.

為回應2025年11月24日舉行的公眾資訊會以及收到的公眾回饋,申請人已在建議書中作出更改納入了不同類型的住宅單位。

新的建議書將提供一共55個社會住宅單位,其中包括46個小型開放式單位社會住宅單位、4個面積較大的無障礙開放式單位單位和5個兩房單位。

如欲了解更多關於建議書的最新更改請點擊: 納入了不同類型的住宅單位的「測試」圖則

該申請繼續推進社會住宅項目,申請人正在考慮與非牟利房屋供應商 Lookout公司合作,由其負責該住宅項目的營運。

請注意,在重新分區階段,市議會不會在提案中指定特定的非牟利房屋供應商。管理該項目的非牟利房屋供應商通常在開發後期階段確定,以便專案在申請政府撥款時擁有更大的靈活性。


Application
(December 13, 2024)

The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from RT-3 (Residential) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a six-storey rental building and includes:

  • 65 micro-dwelling, social housing units;
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 3.04; and
  • A building height of 22.5 m (73 ft.)

This application is being considered under the Downtown Eastside Plan.

Application drawings and statistics are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.


Announcement
(November 14, 2025)

A community information session is scheduled for Monday, November 24, 2025 from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm at Strathcona Community Centre (601 Keefer Street). City Staff and the applicant team will be available to answer any questions and provide information on the proposal.

市政府將在士達孔拿社區中心(Strathcona Community Centre)舉行公眾資訊會 地址:奇化街 601號 (Keefer Street), 溫哥華 。 11月24日(星期一)下午6時至8時。 公眾資訊會當日將提供廣東話及國語口譯服務 。


Announcement
(August 28, 2025)
The applicant had previously partnered with Community Builders, a non-profit housing operator, for future operation of the proposed social housing building. The applicant has indicated they have entered into a new partnership with a different non-profit housing provider, Lookout Housing and Health Society ("Lookout"). No other changes to the rezoning application are proposed.

公告

(2025年8月28日)

申請人本來與非牟利房屋供應商 Community Builders 合作共同經營該擬建的社會住宅計畫。申請人表示,他們已與另一家非牟利房屋供應商 Lookout Housing and Health Society(簡稱「Lookout」)建立了新的合作關係。除此之外,本次重新分區申請未作其他修改。


Revised Submission
(March 2024)

Revised submission in response to clarification of programming from the future building operator.

Changes include removal of the medical room formerly proposed on the ground level, and clarification in the rezoning booklet (see rezoning rationale statement) that the proposal is for independent living, operated by the non-profit social housing provider, Community Builders.

修訂計劃

申請人對提交的方案進行了修訂。修訂內容包括取消原本計劃在底層設置的醫療室(請閱重新分區理由),並在申請手冊中指出該社會住宅方案為將獨立生活公寓,由非牟利房屋供應商 Community Builders 運營。



Referred to Public Hearing

On February 3, 2026, City Council referred this application to a Public Hearing.

Give feedback to City Council:

Send your comments online

or via mail to:

City of Vancouver, City Clerk’s Office
453 West 12th Avenue, Third Floor
Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1V4

Or request to speak, starting approximately one week before the meeting.

Your comments and name will be published in the meeting record.

提交至公開聽證會

在2026年2月3日,市議會已將該申請提交至公開聽證會。

向市議會提供反饋:

在網上提交您的意見

或發電郵到:

City of Vancouver, City Clerk’s Office
453 West 12th Avenue, Third Floor
Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1V4

或者在會議開始前約一星期申請發言。

您的意見和名字將公布在會議記錄中。


Announcement
(December 16, 2025)

In response to the in-person community information session on November 24, 2025 and public feedback received on this application, the applicant has incorporated a unit mix into the proposed development. The proposal now includes 55 social housing units, including 46 micro-dwelling suites, four larger accessible studio units, and five two-bedroom units.

The “test fit” drawings which demonstrate inclusion of a unit mix are included on the righthand side of this page, under the “application documents” heading.

The application continues to propose social housing, and the applicant is considering partnering with Lookout as the proposed building operator.

For information, at the rezoning stage, Council does not approve a specific building operator as part of a proposal. Housing operators are typically secured at later development stages, to provide projects flexibility with senior government funding opportunities.

為回應2025年11月24日舉行的公眾資訊會以及收到的公眾回饋,申請人已在建議書中作出更改納入了不同類型的住宅單位。

新的建議書將提供一共55個社會住宅單位,其中包括46個小型開放式單位社會住宅單位、4個面積較大的無障礙開放式單位單位和5個兩房單位。

如欲了解更多關於建議書的最新更改請點擊: 納入了不同類型的住宅單位的「測試」圖則

該申請繼續推進社會住宅項目,申請人正在考慮與非牟利房屋供應商 Lookout公司合作,由其負責該住宅項目的營運。

請注意,在重新分區階段,市議會不會在提案中指定特定的非牟利房屋供應商。管理該項目的非牟利房屋供應商通常在開發後期階段確定,以便專案在申請政府撥款時擁有更大的靈活性。


Application
(December 13, 2024)

The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from RT-3 (Residential) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a six-storey rental building and includes:

  • 65 micro-dwelling, social housing units;
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 3.04; and
  • A building height of 22.5 m (73 ft.)

This application is being considered under the Downtown Eastside Plan.

Application drawings and statistics are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.


Announcement
(November 14, 2025)

A community information session is scheduled for Monday, November 24, 2025 from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm at Strathcona Community Centre (601 Keefer Street). City Staff and the applicant team will be available to answer any questions and provide information on the proposal.

市政府將在士達孔拿社區中心(Strathcona Community Centre)舉行公眾資訊會 地址:奇化街 601號 (Keefer Street), 溫哥華 。 11月24日(星期一)下午6時至8時。 公眾資訊會當日將提供廣東話及國語口譯服務 。


Announcement
(August 28, 2025)
The applicant had previously partnered with Community Builders, a non-profit housing operator, for future operation of the proposed social housing building. The applicant has indicated they have entered into a new partnership with a different non-profit housing provider, Lookout Housing and Health Society ("Lookout"). No other changes to the rezoning application are proposed.

公告

(2025年8月28日)

申請人本來與非牟利房屋供應商 Community Builders 合作共同經營該擬建的社會住宅計畫。申請人表示,他們已與另一家非牟利房屋供應商 Lookout Housing and Health Society(簡稱「Lookout」)建立了新的合作關係。除此之外,本次重新分區申請未作其他修改。


Revised Submission
(March 2024)

Revised submission in response to clarification of programming from the future building operator.

Changes include removal of the medical room formerly proposed on the ground level, and clarification in the rezoning booklet (see rezoning rationale statement) that the proposal is for independent living, operated by the non-profit social housing provider, Community Builders.

修訂計劃

申請人對提交的方案進行了修訂。修訂內容包括取消原本計劃在底層設置的醫療室(請閱重新分區理由),並在申請手冊中指出該社會住宅方案為將獨立生活公寓,由非牟利房屋供應商 Community Builders 運營。



Referred to Public Hearing

On February 3, 2026, City Council referred this application to a Public Hearing.

Give feedback to City Council:

Send your comments online

or via mail to:

City of Vancouver, City Clerk’s Office
453 West 12th Avenue, Third Floor
Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1V4

Or request to speak, starting approximately one week before the meeting.

Your comments and name will be published in the meeting record.

提交至公開聽證會

在2026年2月3日,市議會已將該申請提交至公開聽證會。

向市議會提供反饋:

在網上提交您的意見

或發電郵到:

City of Vancouver, City Clerk’s Office
453 West 12th Avenue, Third Floor
Vancouver, BC, V5Y 1V4

或者在會議開始前約一星期申請發言。

您的意見和名字將公布在會議記錄中。

​The Q&A period has concluded. Thank you for participating.

The opportunity to ask questions through the Q&A is available from March 26 to April 8, 2025. 

We post all questions as-is and aim to respond within two business days. Some questions may require coordination with internal departments and additional time may be needed to post a response.

Please note that the comment form will remain open after the Q&A period. The Rezoning Planner can also be contacted directly for any further feedback or questions.

  • Share How does the proposed rezoning align with the long-established goals of the Strathcona community, particularly the RT-3 zoning as outlined in the 1992 Strathcona Plan? What specific measures are being taken to ensure that the proposed 6-story, 65 micro-suite building addresses the needs of families and seniors in the area, given the neighborhood's historical focus on family-friendly housing? How does the City plan to address the potential negative impact of placing a DTES SRO (Single Room Occupancy) near an elementary school? What steps are being taken to ensure the safety and well-being of local children and families? Given the community's concerns about the experience and reputation of the non-profit manager (Patricia Hotel) and the for-profit developer, can the City provide reassurances or a clear framework on how the development will be managed in a way that prioritizes community well-being and sustainability? In what ways does this proposal contribute to the broader goal of creating livable, vibrant, and community-oriented spaces within Strathcona, rather than merely focusing on high-density, market-driven development? Considering the existing social housing projects within a block of this site, how does the City plan to ensure that this proposed development complements and supports, rather than undermines, the existing social infrastructure? How does the City evaluate the potential impact of this project on the neighborhood's character, and does this proposal adequately reflect the architectural and community-oriented principles that were the foundation of the Strathcona neighborhood's development? What provisions are being made to guarantee that the proposed micro-suites will offer adequate living space and amenities for residents, especially considering the limited size and design of the building? How does the proposed development align with the City's policy focus on family and infill housing, particularly in light of the impending opening of the new St. Paul’s hospital, and the increased demand for community-centered housing options? What steps will be taken to ensure ongoing community consultation and feedback throughout the development process, and how will concerns raised by the Strathcona community be addressed moving forward? on Facebook Share How does the proposed rezoning align with the long-established goals of the Strathcona community, particularly the RT-3 zoning as outlined in the 1992 Strathcona Plan? What specific measures are being taken to ensure that the proposed 6-story, 65 micro-suite building addresses the needs of families and seniors in the area, given the neighborhood's historical focus on family-friendly housing? How does the City plan to address the potential negative impact of placing a DTES SRO (Single Room Occupancy) near an elementary school? What steps are being taken to ensure the safety and well-being of local children and families? Given the community's concerns about the experience and reputation of the non-profit manager (Patricia Hotel) and the for-profit developer, can the City provide reassurances or a clear framework on how the development will be managed in a way that prioritizes community well-being and sustainability? In what ways does this proposal contribute to the broader goal of creating livable, vibrant, and community-oriented spaces within Strathcona, rather than merely focusing on high-density, market-driven development? Considering the existing social housing projects within a block of this site, how does the City plan to ensure that this proposed development complements and supports, rather than undermines, the existing social infrastructure? How does the City evaluate the potential impact of this project on the neighborhood's character, and does this proposal adequately reflect the architectural and community-oriented principles that were the foundation of the Strathcona neighborhood's development? What provisions are being made to guarantee that the proposed micro-suites will offer adequate living space and amenities for residents, especially considering the limited size and design of the building? How does the proposed development align with the City's policy focus on family and infill housing, particularly in light of the impending opening of the new St. Paul’s hospital, and the increased demand for community-centered housing options? What steps will be taken to ensure ongoing community consultation and feedback throughout the development process, and how will concerns raised by the Strathcona community be addressed moving forward? on Twitter Share How does the proposed rezoning align with the long-established goals of the Strathcona community, particularly the RT-3 zoning as outlined in the 1992 Strathcona Plan? What specific measures are being taken to ensure that the proposed 6-story, 65 micro-suite building addresses the needs of families and seniors in the area, given the neighborhood's historical focus on family-friendly housing? How does the City plan to address the potential negative impact of placing a DTES SRO (Single Room Occupancy) near an elementary school? What steps are being taken to ensure the safety and well-being of local children and families? Given the community's concerns about the experience and reputation of the non-profit manager (Patricia Hotel) and the for-profit developer, can the City provide reassurances or a clear framework on how the development will be managed in a way that prioritizes community well-being and sustainability? In what ways does this proposal contribute to the broader goal of creating livable, vibrant, and community-oriented spaces within Strathcona, rather than merely focusing on high-density, market-driven development? Considering the existing social housing projects within a block of this site, how does the City plan to ensure that this proposed development complements and supports, rather than undermines, the existing social infrastructure? How does the City evaluate the potential impact of this project on the neighborhood's character, and does this proposal adequately reflect the architectural and community-oriented principles that were the foundation of the Strathcona neighborhood's development? What provisions are being made to guarantee that the proposed micro-suites will offer adequate living space and amenities for residents, especially considering the limited size and design of the building? How does the proposed development align with the City's policy focus on family and infill housing, particularly in light of the impending opening of the new St. Paul’s hospital, and the increased demand for community-centered housing options? What steps will be taken to ensure ongoing community consultation and feedback throughout the development process, and how will concerns raised by the Strathcona community be addressed moving forward? on Linkedin Email How does the proposed rezoning align with the long-established goals of the Strathcona community, particularly the RT-3 zoning as outlined in the 1992 Strathcona Plan? What specific measures are being taken to ensure that the proposed 6-story, 65 micro-suite building addresses the needs of families and seniors in the area, given the neighborhood's historical focus on family-friendly housing? How does the City plan to address the potential negative impact of placing a DTES SRO (Single Room Occupancy) near an elementary school? What steps are being taken to ensure the safety and well-being of local children and families? Given the community's concerns about the experience and reputation of the non-profit manager (Patricia Hotel) and the for-profit developer, can the City provide reassurances or a clear framework on how the development will be managed in a way that prioritizes community well-being and sustainability? In what ways does this proposal contribute to the broader goal of creating livable, vibrant, and community-oriented spaces within Strathcona, rather than merely focusing on high-density, market-driven development? Considering the existing social housing projects within a block of this site, how does the City plan to ensure that this proposed development complements and supports, rather than undermines, the existing social infrastructure? How does the City evaluate the potential impact of this project on the neighborhood's character, and does this proposal adequately reflect the architectural and community-oriented principles that were the foundation of the Strathcona neighborhood's development? What provisions are being made to guarantee that the proposed micro-suites will offer adequate living space and amenities for residents, especially considering the limited size and design of the building? How does the proposed development align with the City's policy focus on family and infill housing, particularly in light of the impending opening of the new St. Paul’s hospital, and the increased demand for community-centered housing options? What steps will be taken to ensure ongoing community consultation and feedback throughout the development process, and how will concerns raised by the Strathcona community be addressed moving forward? link

    How does the proposed rezoning align with the long-established goals of the Strathcona community, particularly the RT-3 zoning as outlined in the 1992 Strathcona Plan? What specific measures are being taken to ensure that the proposed 6-story, 65 micro-suite building addresses the needs of families and seniors in the area, given the neighborhood's historical focus on family-friendly housing? How does the City plan to address the potential negative impact of placing a DTES SRO (Single Room Occupancy) near an elementary school? What steps are being taken to ensure the safety and well-being of local children and families? Given the community's concerns about the experience and reputation of the non-profit manager (Patricia Hotel) and the for-profit developer, can the City provide reassurances or a clear framework on how the development will be managed in a way that prioritizes community well-being and sustainability? In what ways does this proposal contribute to the broader goal of creating livable, vibrant, and community-oriented spaces within Strathcona, rather than merely focusing on high-density, market-driven development? Considering the existing social housing projects within a block of this site, how does the City plan to ensure that this proposed development complements and supports, rather than undermines, the existing social infrastructure? How does the City evaluate the potential impact of this project on the neighborhood's character, and does this proposal adequately reflect the architectural and community-oriented principles that were the foundation of the Strathcona neighborhood's development? What provisions are being made to guarantee that the proposed micro-suites will offer adequate living space and amenities for residents, especially considering the limited size and design of the building? How does the proposed development align with the City's policy focus on family and infill housing, particularly in light of the impending opening of the new St. Paul’s hospital, and the increased demand for community-centered housing options? What steps will be taken to ensure ongoing community consultation and feedback throughout the development process, and how will concerns raised by the Strathcona community be addressed moving forward?

    DDESCHENE asked 10 months ago

    Please find below the responses to the questions, in chronological order:

    Quoting the DTES Plan Section 6.7. Strathcona is a “diverse neighbourhood with a mix of residential homes, including single family, co-ops, apartments, and several medium density social housing developments”. The Plan encourages new developments to include a range of housing types, including social housing. Regarding RT-3 compatibility, the building’s massing has been carefully considered to maximize the compatibility of the proposed mid-rise social housing building  to a low-rise neighbourhood context. As such, the proposed building form meets expectations for building height, density, site setbacks, shadow performance, and public realm interface.

    The application is proposing to meet the needs of seniors by allowing seniors to be future tenants of the building. 

    In order to meet the City’s definition of social housing, a building must be non-profit owned and operated. The applicant would be required to transfer the project to a non-profit during the development stage, should the application be approved.
     For questions about the development partnership between the non-profit operator and the applicant, or questions to the operator, please contact the applicant. 

    The DTES Plan, as well as other area plans and city policies, strive to ensure access to affordable housing choices. The application proposes to create livable and vibrate communities by offering a diverse range of housing options. A future social housing building would need to be non-profit owned and operated, and the applicant has indicated their intended future building operator.

    The application proposes to contribute to the existing social infrastructure by proposing affordable housing options for Vancouver residents. 

    In terms of the proposed building form and physical placement on the site, the building responds to the neighbourhood’s low-density character. It meets the intent of the Strathcona/Kiwassa RT-3 Guidelines to “ensure that all development is compatible with surrounding buildings and the neighbourhood as a whole.”  The proposed massing provides a transition to the existing low-rise neighbours to the east and west, and the massing is setback from the property line to provide landscaped areas and respect the rhythm of the existing streetscape, including:

    • Front: The proposed setback (3.7m) provides a green transition at the street interface.
    • Side yards: The proposed setbacks (1.2m) provides an adequate buffer to the neighbours, including the Pender Lodge and the eastern neighbour. 
    • Rear: The proposed 33 ft setback includes the proposed retention of a mature tree and provides common residential outdoor amenity.


    In addition to reflecting the massing context, a key urban design objective is to enhance the pedestrian experience and public realm interface. Staff will review and provide feedback to the applicant based on relevant guidelines, expectations for comparable social housing projects, and community input. Staff advice could include improvements to the façade articulation, exterior wall materials/colours, project entries, ground level patios, and/or landscape improvements.

    The proposal is required to comply with the Micro Dwelling Policies and Guidelines. Units must be a minimum of 76.2 sq. m (250 sq. ft.) with the provision that the internal unit design meets the layout requirements as outlined in 4.1 of the Guidelines. The provision of amenity space would also be in accordance with the Guidelines. Detailed building design will take place at the Development Permit stage should the application be approved. 

    The provision of social housing is one of the City’s housing goals as identified in the Vancouver Housing Strategy, as well as in the DTES Plan. The proposal does propose infill housing, proposing development of a vacant lot. 

    In accordance with the City’s procedures for rezoning application review, staff inform and engage the community in a variety of ways. A site sign is erected on the site, and postcards are sent to properties in the site’s vicinity (usually a 3 block radius) to notify them of a new application. Postcards are also sent to nearby residents notifying them of an upcoming Public Hearing, once scheduled. The virtual Shape Your City allows people to provide comments, and access planning-related documents as well as the applicant’s submitted materials. A virtual Question and Answer period was held between March 26-April 8, with all questions responded to publicly. 

    Comments on the application can continue to be submitted through the SYC page, or directly to the planner. All correspondence received will be summarized and included in the planning report that will be considered by Council at a Public Hearing.

  • Share Can you show the public the following: Which type of social housing the building belongs to? What portion of the residents will be: a) low-income individuals/families/seniors, b) people with disabilities, c) the homeless, d) substance users? on Facebook Share Can you show the public the following: Which type of social housing the building belongs to? What portion of the residents will be: a) low-income individuals/families/seniors, b) people with disabilities, c) the homeless, d) substance users? on Twitter Share Can you show the public the following: Which type of social housing the building belongs to? What portion of the residents will be: a) low-income individuals/families/seniors, b) people with disabilities, c) the homeless, d) substance users? on Linkedin Email Can you show the public the following: Which type of social housing the building belongs to? What portion of the residents will be: a) low-income individuals/families/seniors, b) people with disabilities, c) the homeless, d) substance users? link

    Can you show the public the following: Which type of social housing the building belongs to? What portion of the residents will be: a) low-income individuals/families/seniors, b) people with disabilities, c) the homeless, d) substance users?

    Concerned441-449 asked 10 months ago

    In the City of Vancouver, social housing is rental housing, owned and operated by a non-profit, or by/on behalf of the various levels of government, with tenure and minimum affordability requirements secured through a Housing Agreement. The area in which this building is located requires the following minimum affordability requirements: 1/3 at/below Housing Income Limits (HILs) as set by the Province, 1/3 at shelter/pension rate and 1/3 at affordable market rents. The proposed non-profit operator has indicated that the intended tenant population will be Vancouver residents requiring a range of affordable housing options.  

     Regarding accessibility, the units are currently designed as 100% adaptable Micro-Dwelling units which complies with City of Vancouver Building Code Accessibility requirements. 

  • Share The DTES Plan Implementation Report (2020) noted the following: There is concern for the development of children and youth living in the DTES. The most recent Early Development Instrument survey from 2017-2019 demonstrated high rates multiple vulnerabilities present for children in the neighbourhood, with the highest rates found on the social, physical and emotional scales of development. How does a privately owned and operated single occupancy micro-suite builing help to ameliorate vulnerabilities for DTES children? Could the City not purchase this land and use it for a better community-serving purpose? on Facebook Share The DTES Plan Implementation Report (2020) noted the following: There is concern for the development of children and youth living in the DTES. The most recent Early Development Instrument survey from 2017-2019 demonstrated high rates multiple vulnerabilities present for children in the neighbourhood, with the highest rates found on the social, physical and emotional scales of development. How does a privately owned and operated single occupancy micro-suite builing help to ameliorate vulnerabilities for DTES children? Could the City not purchase this land and use it for a better community-serving purpose? on Twitter Share The DTES Plan Implementation Report (2020) noted the following: There is concern for the development of children and youth living in the DTES. The most recent Early Development Instrument survey from 2017-2019 demonstrated high rates multiple vulnerabilities present for children in the neighbourhood, with the highest rates found on the social, physical and emotional scales of development. How does a privately owned and operated single occupancy micro-suite builing help to ameliorate vulnerabilities for DTES children? Could the City not purchase this land and use it for a better community-serving purpose? on Linkedin Email The DTES Plan Implementation Report (2020) noted the following: There is concern for the development of children and youth living in the DTES. The most recent Early Development Instrument survey from 2017-2019 demonstrated high rates multiple vulnerabilities present for children in the neighbourhood, with the highest rates found on the social, physical and emotional scales of development. How does a privately owned and operated single occupancy micro-suite builing help to ameliorate vulnerabilities for DTES children? Could the City not purchase this land and use it for a better community-serving purpose? link

    The DTES Plan Implementation Report (2020) noted the following: There is concern for the development of children and youth living in the DTES. The most recent Early Development Instrument survey from 2017-2019 demonstrated high rates multiple vulnerabilities present for children in the neighbourhood, with the highest rates found on the social, physical and emotional scales of development. How does a privately owned and operated single occupancy micro-suite builing help to ameliorate vulnerabilities for DTES children? Could the City not purchase this land and use it for a better community-serving purpose?

    Kastanis asked 10 months ago

    The DTES Plan strives to ensure that access to affordable housing choices to meet the diverse needs of the community. A diverse range of housing options is essential to fostering vibrant, healthy communities—environments that, in turn, nurture the well-being of children.

    The City does hold the ability to purchase land through broader area and capital planning. This site is not identified to be purchased by the City. 

    This application proposes to be community-serving by providing affordable housing choices, and contribute social housing units towards the City’s housing goals as identified in the Vancouver Housing Strategy.

  • Share As a independent living building (not supportive - thank goodness!) is this going to be a low-barrier building or regular low-income building (like the ones in Kits or Coal-Harbour)? Very concerned about these low-barrier buildings as its more like harm expansion then reduction. on Facebook Share As a independent living building (not supportive - thank goodness!) is this going to be a low-barrier building or regular low-income building (like the ones in Kits or Coal-Harbour)? Very concerned about these low-barrier buildings as its more like harm expansion then reduction. on Twitter Share As a independent living building (not supportive - thank goodness!) is this going to be a low-barrier building or regular low-income building (like the ones in Kits or Coal-Harbour)? Very concerned about these low-barrier buildings as its more like harm expansion then reduction. on Linkedin Email As a independent living building (not supportive - thank goodness!) is this going to be a low-barrier building or regular low-income building (like the ones in Kits or Coal-Harbour)? Very concerned about these low-barrier buildings as its more like harm expansion then reduction. link

    As a independent living building (not supportive - thank goodness!) is this going to be a low-barrier building or regular low-income building (like the ones in Kits or Coal-Harbour)? Very concerned about these low-barrier buildings as its more like harm expansion then reduction.

    HousingConcerns101 asked 10 months ago

    The proposed building is for social housing – rental housing where the building is owned and operated by a non-profit corporation or non-profit co-operative association, or by or on behalf of the various levels of government (City, Province, Federal). The required minimum rental affordability of social housing in DTES is 1/3 at or below Housing Income Limits (HILs) as set by the Province, 1/3 at shelter/pension rate, and the remaining 1/3 at affordable market rents. 

    The proposed non-profit operator has indicated that the intended tenant population for this site will be residents of Vancouver who require a range of affordable housing options.

  • Share Will the City Planning Department consider sending social housing applications (such as this) to the newly formed DTES NLT for feedback? This type of engagement would seem to align with City council’s direction on addressing public realm and safety concerns. on Facebook Share Will the City Planning Department consider sending social housing applications (such as this) to the newly formed DTES NLT for feedback? This type of engagement would seem to align with City council’s direction on addressing public realm and safety concerns. on Twitter Share Will the City Planning Department consider sending social housing applications (such as this) to the newly formed DTES NLT for feedback? This type of engagement would seem to align with City council’s direction on addressing public realm and safety concerns. on Linkedin Email Will the City Planning Department consider sending social housing applications (such as this) to the newly formed DTES NLT for feedback? This type of engagement would seem to align with City council’s direction on addressing public realm and safety concerns. link

    Will the City Planning Department consider sending social housing applications (such as this) to the newly formed DTES NLT for feedback? This type of engagement would seem to align with City council’s direction on addressing public realm and safety concerns.

    Kastanis asked 10 months ago

    The rezoning application will follow the City’s standard public engagement process, and would not be sent directly to the DTES CLT for feedback. The CLT may contact the applicant directly for further discussions.

  • Share In the DTES rezoning policy, it states about rezoning for Strathcona: Strathcona: In Area ‘D’, of Map A, rezoning applications for residential development will be considered for increasing the heights and densities from what current zoning permits subject to one of the following conditions being met: (a) where the site is an existing social housing site and the amount of social housing is being increased; (b)where the site is fronting on Gore Avenue and all of the residential use is for social housing or secured market rental housing. As this project does not meet the rezoning criteria, why is it being considered? on Facebook Share In the DTES rezoning policy, it states about rezoning for Strathcona: Strathcona: In Area ‘D’, of Map A, rezoning applications for residential development will be considered for increasing the heights and densities from what current zoning permits subject to one of the following conditions being met: (a) where the site is an existing social housing site and the amount of social housing is being increased; (b)where the site is fronting on Gore Avenue and all of the residential use is for social housing or secured market rental housing. As this project does not meet the rezoning criteria, why is it being considered? on Twitter Share In the DTES rezoning policy, it states about rezoning for Strathcona: Strathcona: In Area ‘D’, of Map A, rezoning applications for residential development will be considered for increasing the heights and densities from what current zoning permits subject to one of the following conditions being met: (a) where the site is an existing social housing site and the amount of social housing is being increased; (b)where the site is fronting on Gore Avenue and all of the residential use is for social housing or secured market rental housing. As this project does not meet the rezoning criteria, why is it being considered? on Linkedin Email In the DTES rezoning policy, it states about rezoning for Strathcona: Strathcona: In Area ‘D’, of Map A, rezoning applications for residential development will be considered for increasing the heights and densities from what current zoning permits subject to one of the following conditions being met: (a) where the site is an existing social housing site and the amount of social housing is being increased; (b)where the site is fronting on Gore Avenue and all of the residential use is for social housing or secured market rental housing. As this project does not meet the rezoning criteria, why is it being considered? link

    In the DTES rezoning policy, it states about rezoning for Strathcona: Strathcona: In Area ‘D’, of Map A, rezoning applications for residential development will be considered for increasing the heights and densities from what current zoning permits subject to one of the following conditions being met: (a) where the site is an existing social housing site and the amount of social housing is being increased; (b)where the site is fronting on Gore Avenue and all of the residential use is for social housing or secured market rental housing. As this project does not meet the rezoning criteria, why is it being considered?

    forestgreen asked 10 months ago

    The City is obligated to consider and process all submitted rezoning applications. Compliance with City policies is evaluated through the course of the application review. Staff will form a recommendation on the proposal, to be considered by Council at a Public Hearing.

  • Share Why another Non-Profit? How many social housing buildings in Dtes are Non-profit vs BC Housing operated? As Dtes resident for many years in an independent living Non-profit social housing building I have no rights. They aren't regulated. Staff are corrupt, many addict themselves, buildings full of criminals. Poor governance in an narco-economy. BC Housing has higher standards as seen in their tenant manual but won't help tenants in Non-profit operated buildings. Isn't BC Housing funding them? on Facebook Share Why another Non-Profit? How many social housing buildings in Dtes are Non-profit vs BC Housing operated? As Dtes resident for many years in an independent living Non-profit social housing building I have no rights. They aren't regulated. Staff are corrupt, many addict themselves, buildings full of criminals. Poor governance in an narco-economy. BC Housing has higher standards as seen in their tenant manual but won't help tenants in Non-profit operated buildings. Isn't BC Housing funding them? on Twitter Share Why another Non-Profit? How many social housing buildings in Dtes are Non-profit vs BC Housing operated? As Dtes resident for many years in an independent living Non-profit social housing building I have no rights. They aren't regulated. Staff are corrupt, many addict themselves, buildings full of criminals. Poor governance in an narco-economy. BC Housing has higher standards as seen in their tenant manual but won't help tenants in Non-profit operated buildings. Isn't BC Housing funding them? on Linkedin Email Why another Non-Profit? How many social housing buildings in Dtes are Non-profit vs BC Housing operated? As Dtes resident for many years in an independent living Non-profit social housing building I have no rights. They aren't regulated. Staff are corrupt, many addict themselves, buildings full of criminals. Poor governance in an narco-economy. BC Housing has higher standards as seen in their tenant manual but won't help tenants in Non-profit operated buildings. Isn't BC Housing funding them? link

    Why another Non-Profit? How many social housing buildings in Dtes are Non-profit vs BC Housing operated? As Dtes resident for many years in an independent living Non-profit social housing building I have no rights. They aren't regulated. Staff are corrupt, many addict themselves, buildings full of criminals. Poor governance in an narco-economy. BC Housing has higher standards as seen in their tenant manual but won't help tenants in Non-profit operated buildings. Isn't BC Housing funding them?

    HousingConcerns101 asked 10 months ago

    The City’s definition of social housing is rental housing owned and operator by a non-profit corporation or non-profit co-operative association, or by or on behalf of the various levels of government (City, Province, Federal). The non-profit operator does not currently have approved funding or financing, but has intention to apply to various funding streams to maximize affordability of the proposed units. 

    BC Housing typically provides funding for social housing, and does operate a limited number of social housing buildings in Vancouver. BC Housing is not the proposed operator for the subject proposal. 

  • Share How does this proposed development align with current staff work to disperse social housing throughout Vancouver? Strathcona is not identified as an area for re-zoning under the City’s in progress (2025) social housing initiative. on Facebook Share How does this proposed development align with current staff work to disperse social housing throughout Vancouver? Strathcona is not identified as an area for re-zoning under the City’s in progress (2025) social housing initiative. on Twitter Share How does this proposed development align with current staff work to disperse social housing throughout Vancouver? Strathcona is not identified as an area for re-zoning under the City’s in progress (2025) social housing initiative. on Linkedin Email How does this proposed development align with current staff work to disperse social housing throughout Vancouver? Strathcona is not identified as an area for re-zoning under the City’s in progress (2025) social housing initiative. link

    How does this proposed development align with current staff work to disperse social housing throughout Vancouver? Strathcona is not identified as an area for re-zoning under the City’s in progress (2025) social housing initiative.

    Kastanis asked 10 months ago

    Vancouver’s Social Housing Initiative works toward the need for affordable housing by simplifying and changing zoning regulations to allow for mixed-income social housing to be built without a rezoning. The focus of that initiative is on neighbourhoods outside of the downtown core where there is not existing policy to enable additional height/density for social housing; this does work toward encouraging social housing to be built throughout the city and contributes to creating inclusive neighbourhoods. This initiative does not impact areas of the city where there are community plans in place, such as the DTES Plan which includes Strathcona. In these areas, social housing projects may continue to come in through existing policies.

  • Share Would the architect be willing to explain the disparity between the livability considerations that went into its design of the mixed use and mixed unit design of the 800 Commercial Dr project as compared to this human-warehousing design of micro units that are under 300sq ft? https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/800-commercial-drive-vancouver-social-housing-tower-approved on Facebook Share Would the architect be willing to explain the disparity between the livability considerations that went into its design of the mixed use and mixed unit design of the 800 Commercial Dr project as compared to this human-warehousing design of micro units that are under 300sq ft? https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/800-commercial-drive-vancouver-social-housing-tower-approved on Twitter Share Would the architect be willing to explain the disparity between the livability considerations that went into its design of the mixed use and mixed unit design of the 800 Commercial Dr project as compared to this human-warehousing design of micro units that are under 300sq ft? https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/800-commercial-drive-vancouver-social-housing-tower-approved on Linkedin Email Would the architect be willing to explain the disparity between the livability considerations that went into its design of the mixed use and mixed unit design of the 800 Commercial Dr project as compared to this human-warehousing design of micro units that are under 300sq ft? https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/800-commercial-drive-vancouver-social-housing-tower-approved link

    Would the architect be willing to explain the disparity between the livability considerations that went into its design of the mixed use and mixed unit design of the 800 Commercial Dr project as compared to this human-warehousing design of micro units that are under 300sq ft? https://dailyhive.com/vancouver/800-commercial-drive-vancouver-social-housing-tower-approved

    Kastanis asked 10 months ago

    Please see the below response from the Architect: 

    Each project has its own unique requirements, and this project has focused on small space living to address the needs of the housing operator. Great spaces can be achieved in small areas. For projects with small living units, the reduced floor area is offset with other design considerations. A key design aspect of small unit design is to make sure that each unit has tall ceilings, in our case 2.9m/9’6". The idea being that more volume in each room allows brighter and lighter spaces. We couple the taller heights with increased attention to detail on the design of the millwork (the cupboards, closets, wall beds, and kitchens storage). Efficient and intelligent use of space drives the planning of these spaces. Further, the units are supported by storage spaces in the basement of the building giving residents a place outside of their units to store larger items that they don’t need to access on a daily basis. 

    Small space living projects use the approach of minimizing private space and sharing larger common areas like living rooms and patio spaces. In the proposed building, the shared living space is on the ground floor with access to the rear yard, and the rooftop patio gives residents a dedicated outdoor area they can access when they want another place to go. These approaches are consistent with the City’s requirements for micro units. Finally, we considered how people get to their front doors as an important factor in our design. We prioritized the need for choice by giving people two ways to get to their units by way of a circular hallway. The corridors will have access to natural light through windows at each end of the hallways. Having two ways you can get to every unit, and having a hallway that has lots of natural light helps lighten the overall feeling of the building.

  • Share The BC Housing Community Relations Team has confirmed that "BC Housing is not involved with this development". How do the project proponent and non-profit partners anticipate they will be able to build or operate without any financial or programming support from the province? Has City Council approved construction financing or operating funding for this housing project? Or, is this actually a private development masquerading as government endorsed social housing? on Facebook Share The BC Housing Community Relations Team has confirmed that "BC Housing is not involved with this development". How do the project proponent and non-profit partners anticipate they will be able to build or operate without any financial or programming support from the province? Has City Council approved construction financing or operating funding for this housing project? Or, is this actually a private development masquerading as government endorsed social housing? on Twitter Share The BC Housing Community Relations Team has confirmed that "BC Housing is not involved with this development". How do the project proponent and non-profit partners anticipate they will be able to build or operate without any financial or programming support from the province? Has City Council approved construction financing or operating funding for this housing project? Or, is this actually a private development masquerading as government endorsed social housing? on Linkedin Email The BC Housing Community Relations Team has confirmed that "BC Housing is not involved with this development". How do the project proponent and non-profit partners anticipate they will be able to build or operate without any financial or programming support from the province? Has City Council approved construction financing or operating funding for this housing project? Or, is this actually a private development masquerading as government endorsed social housing? link

    The BC Housing Community Relations Team has confirmed that "BC Housing is not involved with this development". How do the project proponent and non-profit partners anticipate they will be able to build or operate without any financial or programming support from the province? Has City Council approved construction financing or operating funding for this housing project? Or, is this actually a private development masquerading as government endorsed social housing?

    concerned441-449 asked 10 months ago

    In order to meet the City’s definition of social housing, the building will need to be owned and operated by a non-profit corporation, or by or on behalf of government. If the rezoning application is approved, the project will transfer to a non-profit during the development stage. Funding has not yet been secured for this project, but the applicant has indicated that they are pursuing a variety of funding sources from senior levels of government. Consistent with Council policy on social housing, the project is expected to be self-sustaining over the long term and does not require further operating subsidies or property tax exemptions from the City.

Page last updated: 04 Feb 2026, 04:58 PM