888-896 Cambie St rezoning application

Share 888-896 Cambie St rezoning application on Facebook Share 888-896 Cambie St rezoning application on Twitter Share 888-896 Cambie St rezoning application on Linkedin Email 888-896 Cambie St rezoning application link

The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from DD (Downtown) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a 29-storey mixed-use development building with an eight-storey podium and includes:

  • 165 rental residential units on levels fourteen to twenty-nine;
  • Hotel use (246 hotel units) on levels one to thirteen;
  • Commercial space on the ground floor;
  • Site includes two heritage buildings:
    • 888 Cambie St
    • 896 Cambie St
  • Façade retention of heritage building at 888 Cambie St;
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 19.77; and
  • A building height of 86.9 m (285 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space.

This application is being considered under the Downtown Official Development Plan and Rezoning Policy for the Central Business District (CBD) and CBD Shoulder.

Application drawings and statistics are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.

The City of Vancouver has received an application to rezone the subject site from DD (Downtown) District to CD-1 (Comprehensive Development) District. The proposal is to allow for the development of a 29-storey mixed-use development building with an eight-storey podium and includes:

  • 165 rental residential units on levels fourteen to twenty-nine;
  • Hotel use (246 hotel units) on levels one to thirteen;
  • Commercial space on the ground floor;
  • Site includes two heritage buildings:
    • 888 Cambie St
    • 896 Cambie St
  • Façade retention of heritage building at 888 Cambie St;
  • A floor space ratio (FSR) of 19.77; and
  • A building height of 86.9 m (285 ft.) with additional height for rooftop amenity space.

This application is being considered under the Downtown Official Development Plan and Rezoning Policy for the Central Business District (CBD) and CBD Shoulder.

Application drawings and statistics are posted as-submitted to the City. Following staff review, the final project statistics are documented within the referral report.

​The Q&A period has concluded. Thank you for participating.

The opportunity to ask questions through the Q&A is available from January 7 to January 20, 2026.

We post all questions as-is and aim to respond within two business days. Some questions may require coordination with internal departments and additional time may be needed to post a response.

Please note that the comment form will remain open after the Q&A period. The Rezoning Planner can also be contacted directly for any further feedback or questions.

  • Share I am curious to know why there is this new favoured design of creating this massive blocks that often hang over sidewalks, and more slender elegant design on the top part of the building that is not easily seen from the street level. This design feels incredibly oppressive. How does the city consider the impact for pedestrians and make this a livable, inviting street scape. I can see some developments that really take people on the street level into account. I can't see this in this particular development. on Facebook Share I am curious to know why there is this new favoured design of creating this massive blocks that often hang over sidewalks, and more slender elegant design on the top part of the building that is not easily seen from the street level. This design feels incredibly oppressive. How does the city consider the impact for pedestrians and make this a livable, inviting street scape. I can see some developments that really take people on the street level into account. I can't see this in this particular development. on Twitter Share I am curious to know why there is this new favoured design of creating this massive blocks that often hang over sidewalks, and more slender elegant design on the top part of the building that is not easily seen from the street level. This design feels incredibly oppressive. How does the city consider the impact for pedestrians and make this a livable, inviting street scape. I can see some developments that really take people on the street level into account. I can't see this in this particular development. on Linkedin Email I am curious to know why there is this new favoured design of creating this massive blocks that often hang over sidewalks, and more slender elegant design on the top part of the building that is not easily seen from the street level. This design feels incredibly oppressive. How does the city consider the impact for pedestrians and make this a livable, inviting street scape. I can see some developments that really take people on the street level into account. I can't see this in this particular development. link

    I am curious to know why there is this new favoured design of creating this massive blocks that often hang over sidewalks, and more slender elegant design on the top part of the building that is not easily seen from the street level. This design feels incredibly oppressive. How does the city consider the impact for pedestrians and make this a livable, inviting street scape. I can see some developments that really take people on the street level into account. I can't see this in this particular development.

    RBSmith asked about 2 months ago

    Thank you for your comments about the building design and impacts to public realm. Staff are reviewing the proposal in accordance with City policies and urban design guidelines, including considerations related to heritage retention, podium height, setbacks, ground-floor activation, weather protection, materiality, and the public realm interface. These elements are intended to support a comfortable, safe, and inviting pedestrian experience. Public input will be considered as part of staff’s ongoing evaluation of the application. Additional refinements may be required through the Development Permit process should the rezoning application be approved.

    The applicant has provided the following comments on the building design and public interface:
    Thank you for your query, we appreciate and share the concern for a high quality, pedestrian friendly public realm and have endeavored to design a building that supports this goal. The key objectives that drove the design of the project were to create street-level activation and visual transparency on Cambie and Smithe streets including the laneway. Simultaneously, the design needed to integrate the heritage components of the existing 888 Cambie facade and the overall heritage context of the block.

    Balancing these key objectives, the design approach at the lower section of the building matches the 6-storey historic warehouse height of the neighboring buildings, to pay respect to Yaletown as a rail and warehouse district, and to acknowledge the existing warehouse street wall proportions.

    To offset contextual height along the block, and to create liveliness and livability at the street level, the design lifts the building on the main floor to create as much window and transparency as possible into the building from the street. The hotel lobby will be located facing Smithe, wrapping onto Cambie and the lane. The provision for uninterrupted glass on those facades will create strong visual connections and activation from the lobby interior to enliven the street. The inclusion of a canopy and public artwork at the corner of Smithe and Cambie is intended to add a level of human comfort and protection from the elements in addition to urban beautification.

  • Share The rezoning application for 888-896 Cambie Street proposes a 29-storey mixed-use tower with significant scale and complexity. Projects of this scale typically involve multiple years of construction. Residents of the 800 block of Beatty Street (aka Block 68) are currently enduring over 2.5 consecutive years of major construction noise, vibration, dust, and access disruption due to demolition and construction of a 29 storey hotel/residence at the corner of Robson & Beatty (ongoing until 2028), the upgrade construction of an 8 storey building at 837 Beatty (ongoing), and the Beatty Street road upgrades with no recovery period. These are live/work residents, meaning that many residents get no respite from the construction noise Monday-Saturday. There is no cumulative construction impact assessment provided in the publicly posted application materials. I request that the rezoning planner confirm whether such analysis has been conducted, and I ask that City Council not proceed to a decision without a formal cumulative construction impact assessment that accounts for all overlapping projects on this block and the unique circumstances of live/work communities. This is particularly critical as there is mention in the 888-896 Cambie Street Rezoning Booklet on p.18 of potential future construction of another mixed-use tower in Block 68, west of the proposed development. on Facebook Share The rezoning application for 888-896 Cambie Street proposes a 29-storey mixed-use tower with significant scale and complexity. Projects of this scale typically involve multiple years of construction. Residents of the 800 block of Beatty Street (aka Block 68) are currently enduring over 2.5 consecutive years of major construction noise, vibration, dust, and access disruption due to demolition and construction of a 29 storey hotel/residence at the corner of Robson & Beatty (ongoing until 2028), the upgrade construction of an 8 storey building at 837 Beatty (ongoing), and the Beatty Street road upgrades with no recovery period. These are live/work residents, meaning that many residents get no respite from the construction noise Monday-Saturday. There is no cumulative construction impact assessment provided in the publicly posted application materials. I request that the rezoning planner confirm whether such analysis has been conducted, and I ask that City Council not proceed to a decision without a formal cumulative construction impact assessment that accounts for all overlapping projects on this block and the unique circumstances of live/work communities. This is particularly critical as there is mention in the 888-896 Cambie Street Rezoning Booklet on p.18 of potential future construction of another mixed-use tower in Block 68, west of the proposed development. on Twitter Share The rezoning application for 888-896 Cambie Street proposes a 29-storey mixed-use tower with significant scale and complexity. Projects of this scale typically involve multiple years of construction. Residents of the 800 block of Beatty Street (aka Block 68) are currently enduring over 2.5 consecutive years of major construction noise, vibration, dust, and access disruption due to demolition and construction of a 29 storey hotel/residence at the corner of Robson & Beatty (ongoing until 2028), the upgrade construction of an 8 storey building at 837 Beatty (ongoing), and the Beatty Street road upgrades with no recovery period. These are live/work residents, meaning that many residents get no respite from the construction noise Monday-Saturday. There is no cumulative construction impact assessment provided in the publicly posted application materials. I request that the rezoning planner confirm whether such analysis has been conducted, and I ask that City Council not proceed to a decision without a formal cumulative construction impact assessment that accounts for all overlapping projects on this block and the unique circumstances of live/work communities. This is particularly critical as there is mention in the 888-896 Cambie Street Rezoning Booklet on p.18 of potential future construction of another mixed-use tower in Block 68, west of the proposed development. on Linkedin Email The rezoning application for 888-896 Cambie Street proposes a 29-storey mixed-use tower with significant scale and complexity. Projects of this scale typically involve multiple years of construction. Residents of the 800 block of Beatty Street (aka Block 68) are currently enduring over 2.5 consecutive years of major construction noise, vibration, dust, and access disruption due to demolition and construction of a 29 storey hotel/residence at the corner of Robson & Beatty (ongoing until 2028), the upgrade construction of an 8 storey building at 837 Beatty (ongoing), and the Beatty Street road upgrades with no recovery period. These are live/work residents, meaning that many residents get no respite from the construction noise Monday-Saturday. There is no cumulative construction impact assessment provided in the publicly posted application materials. I request that the rezoning planner confirm whether such analysis has been conducted, and I ask that City Council not proceed to a decision without a formal cumulative construction impact assessment that accounts for all overlapping projects on this block and the unique circumstances of live/work communities. This is particularly critical as there is mention in the 888-896 Cambie Street Rezoning Booklet on p.18 of potential future construction of another mixed-use tower in Block 68, west of the proposed development. link

    The rezoning application for 888-896 Cambie Street proposes a 29-storey mixed-use tower with significant scale and complexity. Projects of this scale typically involve multiple years of construction. Residents of the 800 block of Beatty Street (aka Block 68) are currently enduring over 2.5 consecutive years of major construction noise, vibration, dust, and access disruption due to demolition and construction of a 29 storey hotel/residence at the corner of Robson & Beatty (ongoing until 2028), the upgrade construction of an 8 storey building at 837 Beatty (ongoing), and the Beatty Street road upgrades with no recovery period. These are live/work residents, meaning that many residents get no respite from the construction noise Monday-Saturday. There is no cumulative construction impact assessment provided in the publicly posted application materials. I request that the rezoning planner confirm whether such analysis has been conducted, and I ask that City Council not proceed to a decision without a formal cumulative construction impact assessment that accounts for all overlapping projects on this block and the unique circumstances of live/work communities. This is particularly critical as there is mention in the 888-896 Cambie Street Rezoning Booklet on p.18 of potential future construction of another mixed-use tower in Block 68, west of the proposed development.

    Dr. Bushey asked about 2 months ago

    Thank you for your questions and for sharing your concerns regarding the construction impacts of this application. 

    Prior to construction the applicant is required to coordinate construction and street use impacts with the engineering department to mitigate to secure street space and any closures must be permitted in advance with proper traffic management plans. Staff ensure safe vehicular, cycling, and pedestrian provisions during construction to provide access for the local residents and businesses. Construction street use requests with significant impacts are typically not permitted for long durations, especially if there are multiple projects competing for street use. 

    No cumulative impact study is being undertaken at this time. Construction noise in Vancouver is regulated by the Noise Bylaw based on time and location, and is generally banned on Sundays/holidays and limited on weekdays/Saturdays with specific decibel levels for amplified sounds. You can submit a noise report through this 311 portal webpage. 


  • Share When will they start this project? on Facebook Share When will they start this project? on Twitter Share When will they start this project? on Linkedin Email When will they start this project? link

    When will they start this project?

    GTC asked about 2 months ago

    Thank you for your question. 

    This project is currently in the rezoning phase. Rezoning applications take a minimum of 12 months from application submission to public hearing. Following approval by Council, the applicant must submit a Development Permit (DP) application which takes on average a year to process. Timelines can vary depending on project complexity and the applicants’ interest in advancing the process once approvals are given.


Page last updated: 21 Jan 2026, 03:04 PM